Alcotest to Stay For Now In NJ

The New Jersey Supreme Court has ruled that, for the time being, the Alcotest, the chemical test formerly known as the Breathylizer, given to drivers arrested for Driving Under the Influence (DUI) to test their blood alcohol content (BAC) or alcohol to blood ratio, will stay after much debate. For months there has been much discussion of the possibility of dispensing with the Alcotest as a result of the State's failure to comply with the ruling in State v. Chun, 194 N.J. 54 (2008), the monumental case pertaining to the implementation of the Alcotest in place of the Breathylizer and wheher the Alcotest was scientifically reliable as a means of measuring BAC levels. In Chun, the NJ Supreme Court held the Alcotest to be scientifically reliable at the time and that, with the nine software revisions to be implemented over time by the manufacturer, Draeger, it would remain reliable. The recent litigation was over the fact that Draeger never did the software updates and a database that set up to store information regarding Alcotest device logs, including service dates and test results, which attorneys could use in trying DUI matters in the event of errors or discrepancies with machine results. In the past two years there have been an increasing number of people questioning the reliability of the device based on errors in the database and lack of software updates. The result of unreliable machine or data could be a significant detriment to those facing charges of driving under the influence. The NJ Supreme Court has now made it clear that they are deeming the machine to be reliable yet intend to replace its use in the State of New Jersey within the next 3 years. The court expressed that if a suitable replacement can be found they will consider the device, however, in spite of the Courts reversal of it's own prior requirement for updates and database maintenance, with the three years ahead on them there is no rush. DWI in NJ will have a serious impact on your life and can have significant implications in related matters such as later personal injury. If you are charged with a DWI in NJ you should seek an experienced attorney immediately to protect your rights. For more information about DWI, DUI, possession of a CDS in a motor vehicle, reckless driving or other serious municipal court or traffic matters in New Jersey visit HeatherDarlingLawyer.com. This blog is for informational purposes only and not intended to replace the advice of an attorney.

Some Still Say Breathylizer and Alcotest is Already On The Way Out

The Alcotest device which replaced the Breathylizer for driving under the influence (DUI) testing in NJ is already on the way out. The Alcotest was introduced in the late 1990's and was subject to substantial litigation regarding its reliability by 2005. In 2008, the NJ Supreme Court decided State v. Chun and set forth the standards under which the Alcotest could be considered reliable in NJ. Now, software updates to the device as mandated by the Chun court are not available and the online database of readings from the device is corrupt. The device's manufacturer, Draeger Safety Diagnostics, has decided it will no longer employ software developer Ayoka Systems to correct software issues and eliminate issues causing data corruption. Additionally, Draeger will cease to warranty the device in 2016. Rather than employ Ayoka or another company to update the device manufactured by Draeger, the state has opted to find a replacement device for the Alcotest by 2016. Although the Chun court did not indicate Alcotest data from machines without updates would necessarily be corrupt, there are substantial differences between the raw data and the database results. Notably, exceptional results found in the raw data are apparently filtered out by the database. This leaves substantial room to challenge NJ Driving While Intoxicated charges in which the Alcotest is the state's primary evidence. Currently, there is a motion pending regarding the database which may result in a hold on the resolution of DWI cases for a substantial period of time depending on the results of the motion and subsequent challenges relating to reliability of the device and litigants' rights. DUI/DWI in NJ will have a serious impact on your life and can have significant implications in related matters such as later personal injury or vehicular manslaughter charges. If you are charged with DUI in NJ you should seek an experienced attorney immediately to protect your rights. For more information on driving under the influence, reckless driving or other serious municipal court/traffic matters in New Jersey visit HeatherDarlingLawyer.com. This blog is for informational purposes only and in no way intended to replace the advice of an attorney regarding your specific matter.